Direct solar power: Difference between revisions

m
no edit summary
(add section on fridge)
mNo edit summary
Line 31: Line 31:
Such a fridge would open at the top, instead of at the front. The cool air is heavier and this way of opening the fridge reduces energy consumption.
Such a fridge would open at the top, instead of at the front. The cool air is heavier and this way of opening the fridge reduces energy consumption.


The LOW←TECH MAGAZINE article mentions: "A study of direct solar refrigerators in very sunny regions (Texas and New Mexico, USA) showed that they maintained their cooling capacity for 6 or 7 days without power supply. The units operated year-round with solar panels of only 80W to 120W."<ref>Ewert, M., et al. “Photovoltaic direct drive, battery-free solar refrigerator field test results.” Proceedings of the solar conference. American solar energy society; American institute of architects, 2002.</ref>
The LOW←TECH MAGAZINE article mentions: "''A study of direct solar refrigerators in very sunny regions (Texas and New Mexico, USA) showed that they maintained their cooling capacity for 6 or 7 days without power supply. The units operated year-round with solar panels of only 80W to 120W."<ref>Ewert, M., et al. “Photovoltaic direct drive, battery-free solar refrigerator field test results.''” Proceedings of the solar conference. American solar energy society; American institute of architects, 2002.</ref>


== Heating ==
== Heating ==
9

edits